magnetsforsensors.com
1 page · 0.6s · Scanned just now
Mostly human-written
78% confidence
The score is a fingerprint of automation, not a quality judgment. A high score means the page reads as machine-generated. It doesn't mean the page is bad.
This is a technical specification guide written by a domain expert (magnet supplier) for a specialized automotive procurement audience. The prose avoids LLM hallmarks entirely: it uses proper nouns (ISO 26262, ASIL-D, NdFeB, SmCo), cites real standards, acknowledges scope boundaries explicitly ("this guide focuses on the permanent magnet component... not the IC internal diagnostics"), and adopts a direct, stakes-aware tone that an LLM would struggle to sustain without sounding forced. The H2 abundance and bullet structure are typical of technical guides, not AI page builders. No stock photography or generic phrasing detected.
No governance risks detected
- Page title
- ASIL-D Sensor Magnet Requirements | MagnetsForSensors
- Meta description
- Use this ASIL-D sensor magnet guide to specify redundancy, thermal stability, stray-field immunity, and RFQ controls for EV and ADAS programs.
- Canonical URL
- https://magnetsforsensors.com/blog/asil-d-sensor-magnet-requirements
- Robots directive
- Not set — search engines default to index, follow
- Language
- en
- Built with
- Next.js
How the page presents itself in a Google result and as a shared link, rebuilt from the tags we crawled.
ASIL-D Sensor Magnet Requirements | MagnetsForSensors
Use this ASIL-D sensor magnet guide to specify redundancy, thermal stability, stray-field immunity, and RFQ controls for EV and ADAS programs.
- Title · 53 characters
- Description · 142 characters

ASIL-D Sensor Magnet Requirements | MagnetsForSensors
Use this ASIL-D sensor magnet guide to specify redundancy, thermal stability, stray-field immunity, and RFQ controls for EV and ADAS programs.
- Open Graph image present
- Worth notingStructure
17 H2 headings create a dense outline; consider grouping related sections under H3s to improve scannability.
Evidence- “H2: High-Temperature Stability: GBD NdFeB vs. SmCo”H2
- “H2: Stray-Field Immunity and Magnet Geometry”H2
- “H2: Common Failure Modes and Risks”H2
Try thisGroup material-selection headings (thermal stability, stray field, failure modes) under a single parent H2 section, then use H3s for each material type or risk category.
Signals of human authorship the page is doing well.
- Content
Explicit scope boundaries and domain-specific constraints (e.g., 'this guide focuses on the permanent magnet component, not the IC internal diagnostics') signal subject-matter expertise and honest authorship.
- Tone
Stakes-driven voice with clear audience awareness — directly addresses procurement teams, engineers, and safety managers with language that acknowledges real automotive safety consequences.
- Content18
Highly specific technical vocabulary, named standards (ISO 26262, ASIL-D), concrete material comparisons (NdFeB vs SmCo), and domain-specific anecdotes — no generic LLM phrasing
- Structure35
Deliberate info-hierarchy with decision-brief upfront, scoped exclusions, and specialized section ordering (not templated) — but H2 abundance (17) and regular cadence shows some editorial structure
- Imagery25
All alt text present; no stock-photo hallmarks visible; sparse imagery count (11 images for 2962 words) suggests diagrams or technical content rather than stock decoration
- Tone15
Strong, consistent first-person voice from Magnets For Sensors team; direct address to buyers/engineers; stakes-driven language ("The stakes are simply too high"); no marketing-speak uniformity
- Words2,962
- Images11
- Alt coverage100%
- Internal links65
- External links6
- Schema blocks4
- HTML size212 KB
- Text-to-HTML8%
Each bar is one sentence of the page, in reading order — taller means longer. Human prose tends to look jagged, mixing short punches with long explanations. Machine drafts tend to flatten into even bars.
Computed from the body text we crawled, split on punctuation and filtered to prose-length sentences. Rhythm is a heuristic, not a verdict — some human writers are metronomically even, and a good editor smooths a machine draft.
Common AI writing tells we counted in the body text. A few hits is normal. A dense cluster is the signal.
Show counted phrases3 matches across 2 phrases
- “comprehensive”×2
- “robust”×1
- Meta tagsAll presentWhy this matters
Why it matters. Title and description are the two strings Google shows in search results. They decide whether anyone clicks. A canonical tag tells Google which URL is the source of truth when the same content lives at multiple paths.
Passing looks like. A non-empty title under 60 characters, a meta description under 160, and a self-referencing canonical link.
Fix. Add the missing tags inside the page head. Treat the title as a headline you'd want to read in a SERP, not a brand slogan.
- Heading structure1 H1, 17 H2Why this matters
Why it matters. Headings are how crawlers and assistive tech understand a page's outline. One H1 names the page. H2s break it into sections. Skipped levels and missing H1s confuse both.
Passing looks like. Exactly one H1, at least one H2, and no skipped levels (no H1 to H3 jumps).
Fix. Replace the missing or duplicate H1 with a single, descriptive heading. Promote section titles to H2. Demote sub-points to H3.
- Mobile readinessResponsiveWhy this matters
Why it matters. Google indexes mobile-first. A page without a responsive viewport renders zoomed-out on phones, fails Core Web Vitals on touch, and loses its mobile ranking.
Passing looks like. A meta viewport tag with width=device-width and a layout that reflows under 600px.
Fix. Add a viewport meta tag set to width=device-width and initial-scale=1, then audit your largest blocks at mobile widths.
- Page speed signals0.6s · 212 KBWhy this matters
Why it matters. Page weight and response time directly feed Core Web Vitals. Slow LCP and oversized HTML hurt rankings more than people expect.
Passing looks like. First-byte under 1.5s, HTML payload under 500 KB, fewer than 30 images on the initial render.
Fix. Trim render-blocking scripts, defer non-critical CSS, and serve compressed images sized to the viewport. Move heavy components below the fold.
- Schema markup4 schema blocksWhy this matters
Why it matters. JSON-LD structured data is how you earn rich results: review stars, FAQ accordions, breadcrumbs, article cards. Skip it and Google has nothing structured to pull from when it builds your SERP card.
Passing looks like. At least one valid JSON-LD block matching schema.org types relevant to the page (Article, Product, FAQPage, Organization).
Fix. Add an application/ld+json script block describing the page. Validate with Google's Rich Results Test before deploying.
- Broken links1/5 broken in sampleWhy this matters
Why it matters. Broken internal links waste crawl budget, degrade UX, and signal to Google that the site isn't well-maintained. They also cap how deep crawlers reach.
Passing looks like. Every internal link in the sample returns 2xx or 3xx. No dead anchors, no stale paths.
Fix. Use the link list above to spot the broken paths. Either restore the missing pages or update the links to point at live URLs.
- Image alt textAll have altWhy this matters
Why it matters. Alt text is what screen readers read aloud, and what Google reads instead of pixels. Skip it and you lose on both fronts.
Passing looks like. Every meaningful image has a descriptive alt attribute. Decorative images can use alt="" to be skipped intentionally.
Fix. Audit images in /assets and CMS uploads. Write alts that describe what's in the image, not what it links to.
Every H1, H2, and H3 we found on the page, in document order.
Show heading outline
- H1ASIL-D Sensor Magnet Requirements: Engineering & Procurement Guide
- H2Who this is for
- H2What you can decide
- H2Evidence included
- H2Practical boundaries
- H2Key Conclusions for Buyers and Engineers
- H2Why ASIL-D Changes Magnet Requirements
- H2High-Temperature Stability: GBD NdFeB vs. SmCo
- H2Stray-Field Immunity and Magnet Geometry
- H2Common Failure Modes and Risks
- H2Specific ASIL-D Applications and Magnet Requirements
- H2Supplier Communication & Buyer Decision Points
- H2ASIL-D Sensor Magnet RFQ Checklist
- H2Next Steps for Your Procurement Team
- H2Sources & References
- H2Reviewed by
- H2Categories
- H2More Posts
- H3Visualizing Magnetic Field Gradients
- H31. Electric Power Steering (EPS) and Steer-by-Wire
- H32. Brake-by-Wire and Electronic Stability Control (ESC)
- H33. EV Traction Motor Resolvers and Commutation
- H34. Electronic Throttle Control (ETC)
- H3Sensor Magnet Failure Modes and Incoming Inspection Plan
- H3Specifying Magnets for Stray-Field Immune Position Sensors (2-Pole vs 4-Pole)
- H3Automotive vs. Industrial Sensor Magnets: PPAP, Traceability, and Cost Drivers
We HEAD-check up to five internal links to spot broken paths quickly.
Show sampled links
- 200 · OKhttps://magnetsforsensors.com/solutions/speed-rpm-sensing-magnets
- 200 · OKhttps://magnetsforsensors.com/products/multipole-ring-magnets
- 200 · OKhttps://magnetsforsensors.com/oem/magnetic-assembly-engineering
- 200 · OKhttps://magnetsforsensors.com/solutions/high-temperature-sensor-magnets
- 404 · Brokenhttps://magnetsforsensors.com/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection
Was this report useful?
Share this scan
Every CrawlRanker scan gets a public, shareable URL. Send it to a client, post it in a thread, or benchmark a competitor.
Preview scan. SEO checks are live. AI scoring is in beta.