CRCrawlRanker
Back
Scan complete

chinesezodiac.pro

1 page · 2.4s ·

0/ 100
AI automation score

Mostly AI-generated

68% confidence

How to read this score
0–35 · Mostly human35–65 · Mixed signals65–100 · Mostly AI

The score is a fingerprint of automation, not a quality judgment. A high score means the page reads as machine-generated. It doesn't mean the page is bad.

What we saw

The page follows a standard product-landing template (hero, checkmark bullets, numbered 01/02/03 steps, tool cards, FAQ) and its copy repeats the same "one consistent calendar, same rule set" pitch in several places. Voice is uniform and promotional with no named author, though the cited Hong Kong Observatory source and concrete date ranges are specific.

70/100Managed
AI Governance

3 governance risks detected

3 medium
What we scanned
Page title
What Is My Chinese Zodiac? Find Your Sign by Birthday | Chinese Zodiac
Meta description
Enter your birthday to find your Chinese zodiac sign. We check the exact Chinese New Year boundary, so January and February birthdays get the right animal.
Final URL
https://chinesezodiac.pro/
Canonical URL
https://chinesezodiac.pro/
Robots directive
Not set — search engines default to index, follow
Language
en
Built with
Next.js
Search & social preview

How the page presents itself in a Google result and as a shared link, rebuilt from the tags we crawled.

Google result
c
chinesezodiac.prochinesezodiac.pro

What Is My Chinese Zodiac? Find Your Sign by Birthday | Chi…

Enter your birthday to find your Chinese zodiac sign. We check the exact Chinese New Year boundary, so January and February birthdays get the right animal.

  • Title · 70 characters — long titles get cut around 60
  • Description · 155 characters
Fine-tune this snippet in the SERP simulator
Shared link card
chinesezodiac.pro

What Is My Chinese Zodiac? Find Your Sign by Birthday | Chinese Zodiac

Enter your birthday to find your Chinese zodiac sign. We check the exact Chinese New Year boundary, so January and February birthdays get the right animal.

  • Open Graph image present
AI Governance
70/100
Managed3 risks detected
mediumAI score ≥ 70 (predominantly AI-generated content)

AI-generated content may not be copyrightable

The US Copyright Office has held that AI-generated content without sufficient human authorship cannot be registered and receives no copyright protection. This means competitors can freely copy AI-generated pages and you lose exclusivity over your content.

US Copyright Office — Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (2023)EU Copyright Directive
Official guidanceUS Copyright Office — AI and Copyright guidanceCopyright Office — Policy Statement on AI-generated works
Fix
AI authorship documentation guide
## Protecting AI-Assisted Content

To maximise copyright protection for AI-assisted content:

1. **Document human contributions** — Keep records of the prompts used,
   the editorial decisions made, and the human modifications applied.

2. **Edit substantially** — Meaningful human selection, arrangement, and
   creative editing of AI output can establish copyrightable authorship.

3. **Register what you can** — Register works with significant human
   authorship via the US Copyright Office, disclosing AI use as required.

4. **Update your Terms of Service** to address AI-generated content:
   > "Content on this site may be created with AI assistance. We retain
   > rights to the selection, arrangement, and editorial expression of
   > all published content."

See the Copyright Office's [AI guidance](https://www.copyright.gov/ai/)
for current registration requirements.
mediumAI score ≥ 70 with no strong E-E-A-T signals

High AI content score risks Google Helpful Content penalty

Google's Helpful Content system actively demotes content it classifies as written primarily for search engines rather than humans. A predominantly AI-generated site with low E-E-A-T signals is a candidate for site-wide demotion.

Google Search Essentials — Spam Policies
Official guidanceGoogle — AI-generated content and SearchGoogle — Creating helpful, reliable content
Fix
E-E-A-T improvement checklist
## E-E-A-T Improvement Checklist

Google evaluates Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness
(E-E-A-T). For AI-heavy sites:

- [ ] Add named author bios with credentials to key pages
- [ ] Link to primary sources for all factual claims
- [ ] Add a clear About page explaining who runs the site and their expertise
- [ ] Publish a clear editorial policy describing your AI use
- [ ] Add schema markup: `author`, `Organization`, `dateModified`
- [ ] Ensure contact information is present and functional
- [ ] Solicit and publish genuine user reviews where appropriate
- [ ] Verify key facts and add human-authored expertise on high-traffic pages
mediumAI score ≥ 60 and no disclosure statement detected on page

No AI content disclosure detected

EU AI Act Article 50 requires that AI-generated content presented to EU audiences be labelled as such. The FTC has also signalled enforcement interest in undisclosed AI-generated content. A simple site-wide disclosure policy covers both.

EU AI Act Article 50FTC Act §5
Official guidanceEU AI Act — Article 50 (Transparency for general public)FTC — Using AI: What Businesses Need to Know
Fix
AI content disclosure policy template
## AI Content Policy

Some content on this website is created or assisted by artificial intelligence
(AI) tools. We are transparent about our use of AI and committed to accuracy.

**What we use AI for:** [content drafting / image generation / data summaries]
**Human review:** All AI-generated content is reviewed before publication
**Accuracy:** We verify factual claims, but AI-generated content may contain errors

This disclosure is consistent with EU AI Act Article 50 obligations.

Questions? Contact us at [email].

_Policy version: 1.0 — [DATE]_
Site-wide AI disclosure banner (HTML)
<!-- Place in your site header or footer -->
<div
  class="ai-disclosure-notice"
  role="note"
  aria-label="AI content notice"
>
  Some content on this site is AI-assisted.
  <a href="/ai-policy">Our AI policy</a>
</div>
Top findings
  • Strong signalStructure

    Page follows a standard AI-builder landing template: hero, checkmark bullets, 01-02-03 steps, tool cards, FAQ

    Evidence
    • “How to find your Chinese zodiac sign”H2
    • “Find your Chinese zodiac sign in ten seconds”H2
    • “What makes this Chinese zodiac finder different”H2
    Try this

    Replace the generic section sequence with content specific to your site, such as original worked examples or a unique data table.

  • Clear signalContent

    Same 'one consistent calendar, same rule set' claim repeated across sections, reading as filler

    Evidence
    • “Every Chinese zodiac tool here uses the same verified Chinese New Year table and the same rule set”body
    • “Five free Chinese zodiac tools, one consistent calendar”H2
    Try this

    State the consistency claim once, with a concrete example of a boundary case, and cut the repeated restatements.

  • Worth notingTone

    Uniform promotional register with no identifiable author voice across hero, tools and FAQ

    Evidence
    • “Enter your birthday and we'll find your Chinese zodiac animal”body
    Try this

    Add a named author or editor and a short first-person note explaining why the boundary date matters to you.

What's working

Signals of human authorship the page is doing well.

  • Content

    Cites a specific source (Hong Kong Observatory tables) and concrete Jan 21–Feb 20 Chinese New Year window.

SEO auditExcellent
93/100
AI breakdown by category
  • Content66

    Repetitive "one consistent calendar / same rule set" claims and generic "we check the boundary" marketing phrasing across sections

  • Structure80

    Hero → checkmark feature list → 3-step how-to → tool cards → 12-item grid → FAQ, a classic SaaS/AI-builder template order

  • Imagery35

    Only four images, all with alt text; no stock or AI-generated markers visible, so imagery signal is weak

  • Tone68

    Uniform promotional register with no author voice; every section reads as the same polished product pitch

By the numbers
  • Words1,186
  • Images4
  • Alt coverage100%
  • Internal links60
  • External links0
  • Schema blocks2
  • HTML size205 KB
  • Text-to-HTML4%
Sentence rhythmVaried — reads human

Each bar is one sentence of the page, in reading order — taller means longer. Human prose tends to look jagged, mixing short punches with long explanations. Machine drafts tend to flatten into even bars.

Avg words / sentence29.3
Rhythm variation62%
Vocabulary diversity45%
Sentences analysed16

Computed from the body text we crawled, split on punctuation and filtered to prose-length sentences. Rhythm is a heuristic, not a verdict — some human writers are metronomically even, and a good editor smooths a machine draft.

LLM-marker phrases

No common LLM-marker phrases found — none of the stock AI vocabulary we scan for appears in the body text even once.

SEO audit detail
  • Meta tags
    All present
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Title and description are the two strings Google shows in search results. They decide whether anyone clicks. A canonical tag tells Google which URL is the source of truth when the same content lives at multiple paths.

    Passing looks like. A non-empty title under 60 characters, a meta description under 160, and a self-referencing canonical link.

    Fix. Add the missing tags inside the page head. Treat the title as a headline you'd want to read in a SERP, not a brand slogan.

  • Heading structure
    1 H1, 12 H2
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Headings are how crawlers and assistive tech understand a page's outline. One H1 names the page. H2s break it into sections. Skipped levels and missing H1s confuse both.

    Passing looks like. Exactly one H1, at least one H2, and no skipped levels (no H1 to H3 jumps).

    Fix. Replace the missing or duplicate H1 with a single, descriptive heading. Promote section titles to H2. Demote sub-points to H3.

  • Mobile readiness
    Responsive
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Google indexes mobile-first. A page without a responsive viewport renders zoomed-out on phones, fails Core Web Vitals on touch, and loses its mobile ranking.

    Passing looks like. A meta viewport tag with width=device-width and a layout that reflows under 600px.

    Fix. Add a viewport meta tag set to width=device-width and initial-scale=1, then audit your largest blocks at mobile widths.

  • Page speed signals
    2.4s response
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Page weight and response time directly feed Core Web Vitals. Slow LCP and oversized HTML hurt rankings more than people expect.

    Passing looks like. First-byte under 1.5s, HTML payload under 500 KB, fewer than 30 images on the initial render.

    Fix. Trim render-blocking scripts, defer non-critical CSS, and serve compressed images sized to the viewport. Move heavy components below the fold.

  • Schema markup
    2 schema blocks
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. JSON-LD structured data is how you earn rich results: review stars, FAQ accordions, breadcrumbs, article cards. Skip it and Google has nothing structured to pull from when it builds your SERP card.

    Passing looks like. At least one valid JSON-LD block matching schema.org types relevant to the page (Article, Product, FAQPage, Organization).

    Fix. Add an application/ld+json script block describing the page. Validate with Google's Rich Results Test before deploying.

  • Broken links
    0/5 broken in sample
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Broken internal links waste crawl budget, degrade UX, and signal to Google that the site isn't well-maintained. They also cap how deep crawlers reach.

    Passing looks like. Every internal link in the sample returns 2xx or 3xx. No dead anchors, no stale paths.

    Fix. Use the link list above to spot the broken paths. Either restore the missing pages or update the links to point at live URLs.

  • Image alt text
    All have alt
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Alt text is what screen readers read aloud, and what Google reads instead of pixels. Skip it and you lose on both fronts.

    Passing looks like. Every meaningful image has a descriptive alt attribute. Decorative images can use alt="" to be skipped intentionally.

    Fix. Audit images in /assets and CMS uploads. Write alts that describe what's in the image, not what it links to.

Heading outline

Every H1, H2, and H3 we found on the page, in document order.

Show heading outline
  1. H1What Is My Chinese Zodiac?
  2. H2Find my Chinese zodiac sign
  3. H2Your exact sign and traditional zodiac guides
  4. H2What is the Chinese zodiac?
  5. H2How to find your Chinese zodiac sign
  6. H2Five free Chinese zodiac tools, one consistent calendar
  7. H2The 12 Chinese zodiac signs and their years
  8. H2What makes this Chinese zodiac finder different
  9. H2Chinese zodiac example scenarios
  10. H2From the Chinese zodiac guide
  11. H2Chinese zodiac year, not a full birth chart
  12. H2Frequently asked questions
  13. H2Find your Chinese zodiac sign in ten seconds
  14. H3Enter your birthday
  15. H3We check the New Year boundary
  16. H3Get your sign and its dates
  17. H3Chinese Horoscope →
  18. H3Compatibility →
  19. H32027 Year of the Goat →
  20. H3Tai Sui Checker →
  21. H3Rat 鼠
  22. H3Ox 牛
  23. H3Tiger 虎
  24. H3Rabbit 兔
  25. H3Dragon 龙
  26. H3Snake 蛇
  27. H3Horse 马
  28. H3Goat 羊
  29. H3Monkey 猴
  30. H3Rooster 鸡
  31. H3Dog 狗
  32. H3Pig 猪
  33. H3Verified New Year dates
  34. H3Readings that don’t change on refresh
  35. H3Traditional relationships, no fake scores
  36. H3Private by design
  37. H3Year of the Tiger: Tiger Zodiac Years, Dates, Traits and Compatibility
  38. H3Year of the Snake: Snake Zodiac Years, Dates, Traits and Compatibility
  39. H3Year of the Rooster: Rooster Zodiac Years, Dates, Traits and Compatibility
Sampled links

We HEAD-check up to five internal links to spot broken paths quickly.

Show sampled links

Was this report useful?

Share this scan

Every CrawlRanker scan gets a public, shareable URL. Send it to a client, post it in a thread, or benchmark a competitor.

Scan another site

Preview scan. SEO checks are live. AI scoring is in beta.