mrrpsoftware.com
1 page · 0.1s ·
Mostly human-written
68% confidence
The score is a fingerprint of automation, not a quality judgment. A high score means the page reads as machine-generated. It doesn't mean the page is bad.
The page reads as a single freelancer's voice with named identity, local specifics (Tampere, Y-tunnus, phone, pilot-client pricing) and idiosyncratic Finnish phrasing like "makua ei teeskenneltyä". The only templated traces are the four-step process headings and the three-card comparison, which are common freelancer patterns rather than strong AI-builder markers.
No governance risks detected
- Page title
- Nettisivut ja kotisivut Tampereelta | Mrrp Software
- Meta description
- Olen tamperelainen ohjelmistokehittäjä ja valokuvaaja. Suunnittelen ja koodaan nettisivut ja kotisivut itse, ilman valmispohjia. Esikatselu on maksuton.
- Final URL
- https://mrrpsoftware.com/
- Canonical URL
- https://mrrpsoftware.com/
- Robots directive
- Not set — search engines default to index, follow
- Language
- fi
How the page presents itself in a Google result and as a shared link, rebuilt from the tags we crawled.
Nettisivut ja kotisivut Tampereelta | Mrrp Software
Olen tamperelainen ohjelmistokehittäjä ja valokuvaaja. Suunnittelen ja koodaan nettisivut ja kotisivut itse, ilman valmispohjia. Esikatselu on maksuton.
- Title · 51 characters
- Description · 152 characters

Nettisivut ja kotisivut Tampereelta | Mrrp Software
Olen tamperelainen ohjelmistokehittäjä ja valokuvaaja. Suunnittelen ja koodaan nettisivut ja kotisivut itse, ilman valmispohjia. Esikatselu on maksuton.
- Open Graph image present
- Worth notingStructure
Process section uses a tidy four-step H3 sequence that mirrors common AI-builder 'how it works' blocks
Evidence- “Kerrot yrityksestäsi”H3
- “Viimeistelen sivut”H3
Try thisKeep the steps, but write the headings as specific actions with your own examples so they don't read as a generic template.
- Worth notingImagery
Three of five images lack alt text on a portfolio-led page
Evidence- “Emilia Sipola”alt
Try thisAdd descriptive alt text to every portfolio image so the photography work is readable to screen readers and search.
Signals of human authorship the page is doing well.
- Tone
Distinct named first-person voice with local specifics: Tampere, Y-tunnus, direct phone and a concrete pilot-client price offer.
- Content
Concrete pricing and a real pilot offer ('Otan viisi pilottiasiakasta') give the copy stakes rather than generic promises.
- Content18
Named author, real phone, Y-tunnus and concrete prices (1 500 €, 1 000 €) with a specific offer for five pilot clients
- Structure28
Four-step process cards and three-column comparison, but layout is custom to a freelancer's own portfolio rather than a generic builder template
- Imagery22
Few images, 3 of 5 missing alt text; subject matter is the photographer's own work rather than stock
- Tone10
Idiosyncratic first-person voice: "Koodaan sivusi itse", "makua ei teeskenneltyä", with a playful self-description as photographer
- Words262
- Images5
- Alt coverage40%
- Images without size0
- Internal links28
- External links1
- Schema blocks1
- HTML size34 KB
- Text-to-HTML6%
Each bar is one sentence of the page, in reading order — taller means longer. Human prose tends to look jagged, mixing short punches with long explanations. Machine drafts tend to flatten into even bars.
Computed from the body text we crawled, split on punctuation and filtered to prose-length sentences. Rhythm is a heuristic, not a verdict — some human writers are metronomically even, and a good editor smooths a machine draft.
No common LLM-marker phrases found — none of the stock AI vocabulary we scan for appears in the body text even once.
- Meta tagsAll presentWhy this matters
Why it matters. Title and description are the two strings Google shows in search results. They decide whether anyone clicks. A canonical tag tells Google which URL is the source of truth when the same content lives at multiple paths.
Passing looks like. A title, a meta description and a canonical link are all present, with exactly one description tag, placed where Google reads it. Their lengths are shown in the report's search preview.
Fix. Add the missing tags inside the page head and delete any second description tag. Keep images and iframes below your meta tags, because Google stops reading the head at the first one. Treat the title as a headline you'd want to read in a SERP, not a brand slogan.
- Heading structure1 H1, 4 H2Why this matters
Why it matters. Headings are how crawlers and assistive tech understand a page's outline. One H1 names the page. H2s break it into sections. A missing H1, or several, blurs what the page is about.
Passing looks like. Exactly one H1, and at least one H2.
Fix. Replace the missing or duplicate H1 with a single, descriptive heading. Promote section titles to H2. Demote sub-points to H3.
- Mobile readinessResponsiveWhy this matters
Why it matters. Google indexes the mobile version of a page. Without a responsive viewport, phones render the page zoomed out, which makes it hard to read and use.
Passing looks like. A viewport meta tag set to width=device-width. The scan reads the HTML and doesn't render the page, so it can't check touch targets or font sizes.
Fix. Add a viewport meta tag set to width=device-width and initial-scale=1, then audit your largest blocks at mobile widths.
- Page speed signals0.1s · 34 KBWhy this matters
Why it matters. Response time, page weight and images that load without a reserved size all show up in Core Web Vitals. Slow pages, and layouts that jump as images arrive, cost visitors and rankings.
Passing looks like. The HTML arrives in under 1.5 s and weighs under 500 KB, the page has fewer than 30 images, and no more than two images lack width and height. These are signals from one HTML fetch, not a PageSpeed Insights measurement.
Fix. Speed up the server response and trim the HTML. Give every image width and height attributes, or a CSS aspect-ratio, so the layout doesn't jump, and serve compressed images sized to the viewport.
- Schema markup1 schema blocksWhy this matters
Why it matters. JSON-LD structured data is how you earn rich results: review stars, FAQ accordions, breadcrumbs, article cards. Skip it and Google has nothing structured to pull from when it builds your SERP card.
Passing looks like. At least one JSON-LD block is present. The check doesn't validate the block or its types, so test it with Google's Rich Results Test too.
Fix. Add an application/ld+json script block describing the page. Validate with Google's Rich Results Test before deploying.
- Broken links0/5 broken in sampleWhy this matters
Why it matters. Broken internal links waste crawl budget, degrade UX, and signal to Google that the site isn't well-maintained. They also cap how deep crawlers reach.
Passing looks like. Every internal link in the sample loads successfully, after following redirects. Timeouts and network errors count as broken.
Fix. Use the link list above to spot the broken paths. Either restore the missing pages or update the links to point at live URLs.
- Image alt text3/5 missing altWhy this matters
Why it matters. Alt text is what screen readers read aloud, and what Google reads instead of pixels. Skip it and you lose on both fronts.
Passing looks like. Nearly every image has non-empty alt text. An empty alt="" counts as missing here, even on a decorative image.
Fix. Audit images in /assets and CMS uploads. Write alts that describe what's in the image, not what it links to.
Every H1, H2, and H3 we found on the page, in document order.
Show heading outline
- H1Suunnittelen sivusi alusta, en pohjasta.
- H2Koodaan sivusi itse.
- H2Kolme sivustoa, kolme eri ratkaisua.
- H2Kotisivut 1 500 €
- H2Kerro, mitä teet.
- H3Kerrot yrityksestäsi
- H3Näet esikatselun
- H3Viimeistelen sivut
- H3Sivut ovat sinun
- H3Hintaan kuuluu
We HEAD-check up to five internal links to spot broken paths quickly.
Show sampled links
Was this report useful?
Add this badge to the page
The page we scanned reads as mostly human-written. This verdict covers that one page, so put the badge on it, not in a sitewide footer. The badge names the page and links back to this report, so anyone who sees it can check the evidence.
The badge shows this report's AI score and scan date. After a big change to the page, re-scan it and swap in the new report's badge.
Share this scan
Every CrawlRanker scan gets a public, shareable URL. Send it to a client, post it in a thread, or benchmark a competitor.
Preview scan. SEO checks are live. AI scoring is in beta.