CRCrawlRanker
Back
Scan complete

customgraphiteparts.com

1 page · 0.5s ·

0/ 100
AI automation score

Mixed signals

62% confidence

How to read this score
0–35 · Mostly human35–65 · Mixed signals65–100 · Mostly AI

The score is a fingerprint of automation, not a quality judgment. A high score means the page reads as machine-generated. It doesn't mean the page is bad.

What we saw

The page is long and substantive, but its heading scaffold (Capability Highlights, Key Metrics & Specifications, Risk Controls, Source Basis & Limits, Related Bearing Resources) follows a templated pattern typical of programmatic or AI-assisted B2B pages. Prose reads as uniformly neutral marketing copy, though the technical specifics (PV indicator, grade limits, export workflow) point toward real domain content.

70/100Managed
AI Governance· ecommerce

2 governance risks detected

1 high1 medium
What we scanned
Page title
Carbon Graphite Bearings RFQ Review | Custom Graphite Parts
Meta description
Screen carbon graphite bearings by journal diameter, pressure, speed, temperature and environment; review grade limits and request a drawing-based RFQ review.
Final URL
https://customgraphiteparts.com/products/carbon-graphite-bearings
Canonical URL
https://customgraphiteparts.com/products/carbon-graphite-bearings
Robots directive
Not set — search engines default to index, follow
Language
en
Built with
Next.js
Search & social preview

How the page presents itself in a Google result and as a shared link, rebuilt from the tags we crawled.

Google result
c
customgraphiteparts.comcustomgraphiteparts.com/products/carbon-graphite-bearings

Carbon Graphite Bearings RFQ Review | Custom Graphite Parts

Screen carbon graphite bearings by journal diameter, pressure, speed, temperature and environment; review grade limits and request a drawing-based RFQ rev…

  • Title · 59 characters
  • Description · 158 characters — long descriptions get cut around 155
Fine-tune this snippet in the SERP simulator
Shared link card
customgraphiteparts.com

Carbon Graphite Bearings RFQ Review | Custom Graphite Parts

Screen carbon graphite bearings by journal diameter, pressure, speed, temperature and environment; review grade limits and request a drawing-based RFQ review.

  • Open Graph image present
AI Governanceecommerce · 100%
70/100
Managed2 risks detected
highE-commerce site with AI score ≥ 60

AI-generated product descriptions risk FTC false advertising action

FTC Act §5 prohibits unfair or deceptive acts regardless of whether they are intentional. AI-generated product descriptions that contain unsupported efficacy claims, fabricated specifications, or misleading comparisons are fully subject to this standard.

FTC Act Section 5FTC Advertising Guidelines
Official guidanceFTC — Advertising and Marketing BasicsFTC Act Section 5
Fix
Product description review checklist
## AI Product Description Review Checklist

Before publishing AI-generated product descriptions, verify:

- [ ] All specification claims (dimensions, weight, materials) match supplier data
- [ ] Performance claims ("best", "fastest", "most durable") are either removed or substantiated
- [ ] Comparison claims against competitors are accurate and current
- [ ] Health or safety benefit claims are reviewed by a qualified person
- [ ] "AI-assisted" label added if required by platform terms

**FTC standard:** Advertising must be truthful, not misleading, and claims
must be substantiated before publishing — not after a complaint.
mediumAI score ≥ 60 and no disclosure statement detected on page

No AI content disclosure detected

EU AI Act Article 50 requires that AI-generated content presented to EU audiences be labelled as such. The FTC has also signalled enforcement interest in undisclosed AI-generated content. A simple site-wide disclosure policy covers both.

EU AI Act Article 50FTC Act §5
Official guidanceEU AI Act — Article 50 (Transparency for general public)FTC — Using AI: What Businesses Need to Know
Fix
AI content disclosure policy template
## AI Content Policy

Some content on this website is created or assisted by artificial intelligence
(AI) tools. We are transparent about our use of AI and committed to accuracy.

**What we use AI for:** [content drafting / image generation / data summaries]
**Human review:** All AI-generated content is reviewed before publication
**Accuracy:** We verify factual claims, but AI-generated content may contain errors

This disclosure is consistent with EU AI Act Article 50 obligations.

Questions? Contact us at [email].

_Policy version: 1.0 — [DATE]_
Site-wide AI disclosure banner (HTML)
<!-- Place in your site header or footer -->
<div
  class="ai-disclosure-notice"
  role="note"
  aria-label="AI content notice"
>
  Some content on this site is AI-assisted.
  <a href="/ai-policy">Our AI policy</a>
</div>
Top findings
  • Clear signalStructure

    Section headings follow a generic template scaffold rather than page-specific wording

    Evidence
    • “Source Basis & Limits”H2
    • “Selection Logic & Constraints”H2
    • “Key decisions before ordering carbon graphite bearings”H2
    Try this

    Rewrite generic section labels as specific questions a buyer would ask, such as the actual grade trade-offs for submerged service.

  • Clear signalImagery

    Three of four images lack alt text, suggesting no review of visuals

    Evidence
    • “Carbon Graphite Bearings”H1
    Try this

    Add descriptive alt text to every image and replace any generic visuals with photos of actual machined bearings.

  • Worth notingContent

    Copy is technically dense but lacks named people, dates, or real customer anecdotes

    Evidence
    • “Custom machined carbon graphite bearings for application-specific dry, lubricated, and submerged service.”body
    Try this

    Add a real machining case, named engineer, or specific customer scenario to anchor the technical claims.

What's working

Signals of human authorship the page is doing well.

  • Content

    Concrete technical specifics such as PV estimation inputs, grade limits, and atmosphere options show domain depth.

SEO auditGood
86/100
AI breakdown by category
  • Content58

    Generic section labels like "Risk Controls" and "Source Basis & Limits" over technical copy with few named people or dates

  • Structure72

    Stacked template-style H2 sections (Capability Highlights, Typical Applications, Key Metrics, FAQ) with uniform heading cadence

  • Imagery55

    Only 4 images, 3 missing alt text; no visible product photography or custom imagery evident in crawl

  • Tone52

    Uniform corporate register across sections; practical specifics but no distinct author voice surfaced

By the numbers
  • Words1,838
  • Images4
  • Alt coverage25%
  • Images without size0
  • Internal links97
  • External links9
  • Schema blocks5
  • HTML size217 KB
  • Text-to-HTML5%
Sentence rhythmModerate variation

Each bar is one sentence of the page, in reading order — taller means longer. Human prose tends to look jagged, mixing short punches with long explanations. Machine drafts tend to flatten into even bars.

Avg words / sentence37.9
Rhythm variation52%
Vocabulary diversity53%
Sentences analysed9

Computed from the body text we crawled, split on punctuation and filtered to prose-length sentences. Rhythm is a heuristic, not a verdict — some human writers are metronomically even, and a good editor smooths a machine draft.

LLM-marker phrases

No common LLM-marker phrases found — none of the stock AI vocabulary we scan for appears in the body text even once.

SEO audit detail
  • Meta tags
    All present
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Title and description are the two strings Google shows in search results. They decide whether anyone clicks. A canonical tag tells Google which URL is the source of truth when the same content lives at multiple paths.

    Passing looks like. A title, a meta description and a canonical link are all present, with exactly one description tag, placed where Google reads it. Their lengths are shown in the report's search preview.

    Fix. Add the missing tags inside the page head and delete any second description tag. Keep images and iframes below your meta tags, because Google stops reading the head at the first one. Treat the title as a headline you'd want to read in a SERP, not a brand slogan.

  • Heading structure
    1 H1, 13 H2
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Headings are how crawlers and assistive tech understand a page's outline. One H1 names the page. H2s break it into sections. A missing H1, or several, blurs what the page is about.

    Passing looks like. Exactly one H1, and at least one H2.

    Fix. Replace the missing or duplicate H1 with a single, descriptive heading. Promote section titles to H2. Demote sub-points to H3.

  • Mobile readiness
    Responsive
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Google indexes the mobile version of a page. Without a responsive viewport, phones render the page zoomed out, which makes it hard to read and use.

    Passing looks like. A viewport meta tag set to width=device-width. The scan reads the HTML and doesn't render the page, so it can't check touch targets or font sizes.

    Fix. Add a viewport meta tag set to width=device-width and initial-scale=1, then audit your largest blocks at mobile widths.

  • Page speed signals
    0.5s · 217 KB
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Response time, page weight and images that load without a reserved size all show up in Core Web Vitals. Slow pages, and layouts that jump as images arrive, cost visitors and rankings.

    Passing looks like. The HTML arrives in under 1.5 s and weighs under 500 KB, the page has fewer than 30 images, and no more than two images lack width and height. These are signals from one HTML fetch, not a PageSpeed Insights measurement.

    Fix. Speed up the server response and trim the HTML. Give every image width and height attributes, or a CSS aspect-ratio, so the layout doesn't jump, and serve compressed images sized to the viewport.

  • Schema markup
    5 schema blocks
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. JSON-LD structured data is how you earn rich results: review stars, FAQ accordions, breadcrumbs, article cards. Skip it and Google has nothing structured to pull from when it builds your SERP card.

    Passing looks like. At least one JSON-LD block is present. The check doesn't validate the block or its types, so test it with Google's Rich Results Test too.

    Fix. Add an application/ld+json script block describing the page. Validate with Google's Rich Results Test before deploying.

  • Broken links
    0/5 broken in sample
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Broken internal links waste crawl budget, degrade UX, and signal to Google that the site isn't well-maintained. They also cap how deep crawlers reach.

    Passing looks like. Every internal link in the sample loads successfully, after following redirects. Timeouts and network errors count as broken.

    Fix. Use the link list above to spot the broken paths. Either restore the missing pages or update the links to point at live URLs.

  • Image alt text
    3/4 missing alt
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Alt text is what screen readers read aloud, and what Google reads instead of pixels. Skip it and you lose on both fronts.

    Passing looks like. Nearly every image has non-empty alt text. An empty alt="" counts as missing here, even on a decorative image.

    Fix. Audit images in /assets and CMS uploads. Write alts that describe what's in the image, not what it links to.

Heading outline

Every H1, H2, and H3 we found on the page, in document order.

Show heading outline
  1. H1Carbon Graphite Bearings
  2. H2Bearing service RFQ checker
  3. H2Capability Highlights
  4. H2Typical Applications
  5. H2Key Metrics & Specifications
  6. H2Risk Controls
  7. H2Need a drawing-based manufacturer review?
  8. H2Engineering Focus
  9. H2Key decisions before ordering carbon graphite bearings
  10. H2Source Basis & Limits
  11. H2Selection Logic & Constraints
  12. H2Related Bearing Resources
  13. H2Frequently Asked Questions
  14. H2RFQ Review
  15. H3Enter duty data to calculate a provisional PV estimate
  16. H31. A PV estimate is not a pass/fail rating
  17. H32. Temperature ratings belong to a named grade
  18. H33. Liquid service depends on porosity and chemistry
  19. H34. Clearance and shaft pairing need drawing review
  20. H3Do carbon graphite bearings need lubrication?
  21. H3Is there one maximum temperature for carbon graphite bearings?
  22. H3How should I interpret the PV estimate on this page?
  23. H3Can carbon graphite bearings be used submerged?
  24. H3What details should I include in a bearing RFQ?
  25. H3Can I assume a press fit or shrink fit?
Sampled links

We HEAD-check up to five internal links to spot broken paths quickly.

Show sampled links

Was this report useful?

Share this scan

Every CrawlRanker scan gets a public, shareable URL. Send it to a client, post it in a thread, or benchmark a competitor.

Scan another site

Preview scan. SEO checks are live. AI scoring is in beta.