CRCrawlRanker
Back
Scan complete

afpmmotor.com

1 page · 0.6s ·

0/ 100
AI automation score

Mixed signals

60% confidence

How to read this score
0–35 · Mostly human35–65 · Mixed signals65–100 · Mostly AI

The score is a fingerprint of automation, not a quality judgment. A high score means the page reads as machine-generated. It doesn't mean the page is bad.

What we saw

Headings are full-sentence, parallel constructions ("Custom work is useful only when the variables are explicit," "Start with buildable product scope instead of a generic supplier promise"), and the capability cards follow a repeated icon-title-two-sentence pattern typical of AI-assisted builders. Offsetting this, the page carries dense, specific engineering detail (Hipot, back-EMF, IP55–IP67, -40°C to +160°C, named test records) that a generic generator would rarely produce.

90/100Clean
AI Governance

1 governance risk detected

1 medium
What we scanned
Page title
AFPM Motor | Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Motor OEM
Meta description
Custom AFPM motors, dual-rotor axial flux PM motors, stator and rotor assemblies, and axial flux generator OEM support for global engineering teams.
Final URL
https://afpmmotor.com/
Canonical URL
https://afpmmotor.com/
Robots directive
Not set — search engines default to index, follow
Language
en
Built with
Next.js
Search & social preview

How the page presents itself in a Google result and as a shared link, rebuilt from the tags we crawled.

Google result
a
afpmmotor.comafpmmotor.com

AFPM Motor | Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Motor OEM

Custom AFPM motors, dual-rotor axial flux PM motors, stator and rotor assemblies, and axial flux generator OEM support for global engineering teams.

  • Title · 50 characters
  • Description · 148 characters
Fine-tune this snippet in the SERP simulator
Shared link card
afpmmotor.com

AFPM Motor | Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Motor OEM

Custom AFPM motors, dual-rotor axial flux PM motors, stator and rotor assemblies, and axial flux generator OEM support for global engineering teams.

  • Open Graph image present
AI Governance
90/100
Clean1 risk detected
mediumAI score ≥ 60 and no disclosure statement detected on page

No AI content disclosure detected

EU AI Act Article 50 requires that AI-generated content presented to EU audiences be labelled as such. The FTC has also signalled enforcement interest in undisclosed AI-generated content. A simple site-wide disclosure policy covers both.

EU AI Act Article 50FTC Act §5
Official guidanceEU AI Act — Article 50 (Transparency for general public)FTC — Using AI: What Businesses Need to Know
Fix
AI content disclosure policy template
## AI Content Policy

Some content on this website is created or assisted by artificial intelligence
(AI) tools. We are transparent about our use of AI and committed to accuracy.

**What we use AI for:** [content drafting / image generation / data summaries]
**Human review:** All AI-generated content is reviewed before publication
**Accuracy:** We verify factual claims, but AI-generated content may contain errors

This disclosure is consistent with EU AI Act Article 50 obligations.

Questions? Contact us at [email].

_Policy version: 1.0 — [DATE]_
Site-wide AI disclosure banner (HTML)
<!-- Place in your site header or footer -->
<div
  class="ai-disclosure-notice"
  role="note"
  aria-label="AI content notice"
>
  Some content on this site is AI-assisted.
  <a href="/ai-policy">Our AI policy</a>
</div>
Top findings
  • Clear signalStructure

    Capability cards and headings follow a uniform template with parallel full-sentence H2s

    Evidence
    • “Quality Gates, Not Slogans”body
    • “Custom work is useful only when the variables are explicit.”H2
    • “Prototype to Volume Path”body
    Try this

    Vary heading length and form, and replace some full-sentence H2s with short labels that name the actual product or process.

  • Clear signalContent

    Marketing phrasing is generic in places while technical specifics are strong

    Evidence
    • “Start with buildable product scope instead of a generic supplier promise.”body
    • “Send the parameters that change design, cost, and lead time.”H2
    Try this

    Cut contrast-framing lines like 'instead of a generic promise' and state concrete outcomes, such as a named customer result or a real sample lead time.

What's working

Signals of human authorship the page is doing well.

  • Content

    Specific engineering detail: named test procedures, IP ratings, temperature range, and a 4-8 week sample window.

SEO auditExcellent
100/100
AI breakdown by category
  • Content66

    Parallel "X, Not Y" and "instead of" framing across headings like "Quality Gates, Not Slogans" reads as templated B2B copy

  • Structure72

    Hero, then 4-card capability grid, stats row, then Q&A-style sections; a common AI site-builder layout

  • Imagery35

    18 images with full alt coverage and no visible AI filenames; the imagery signal is weak and not conclusive

  • Tone58

    Uniform, polished register throughout with no author voice, though specific technical detail offsets the generic marketing tone

By the numbers
  • Words1,285
  • Images18
  • Alt coverage100%
  • Internal links55
  • External links4
  • Schema blocks2
  • HTML size297 KB
  • Text-to-HTML3%
LLM-marker phrases

No common LLM-marker phrases found — none of the stock AI vocabulary we scan for appears in the body text even once.

SEO audit detail
  • Meta tags
    All present
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Title and description are the two strings Google shows in search results. They decide whether anyone clicks. A canonical tag tells Google which URL is the source of truth when the same content lives at multiple paths.

    Passing looks like. A non-empty title under 60 characters, a meta description under 160, and a self-referencing canonical link.

    Fix. Add the missing tags inside the page head. Treat the title as a headline you'd want to read in a SERP, not a brand slogan.

  • Heading structure
    1 H1, 11 H2
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Headings are how crawlers and assistive tech understand a page's outline. One H1 names the page. H2s break it into sections. Skipped levels and missing H1s confuse both.

    Passing looks like. Exactly one H1, at least one H2, and no skipped levels (no H1 to H3 jumps).

    Fix. Replace the missing or duplicate H1 with a single, descriptive heading. Promote section titles to H2. Demote sub-points to H3.

  • Mobile readiness
    Responsive
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Google indexes mobile-first. A page without a responsive viewport renders zoomed-out on phones, fails Core Web Vitals on touch, and loses its mobile ranking.

    Passing looks like. A meta viewport tag with width=device-width and a layout that reflows under 600px.

    Fix. Add a viewport meta tag set to width=device-width and initial-scale=1, then audit your largest blocks at mobile widths.

  • Page speed signals
    0.6s · 297 KB
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Page weight and response time directly feed Core Web Vitals. Slow LCP and oversized HTML hurt rankings more than people expect.

    Passing looks like. First-byte under 1.5s, HTML payload under 500 KB, fewer than 30 images on the initial render.

    Fix. Trim render-blocking scripts, defer non-critical CSS, and serve compressed images sized to the viewport. Move heavy components below the fold.

  • Schema markup
    2 schema blocks
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. JSON-LD structured data is how you earn rich results: review stars, FAQ accordions, breadcrumbs, article cards. Skip it and Google has nothing structured to pull from when it builds your SERP card.

    Passing looks like. At least one valid JSON-LD block matching schema.org types relevant to the page (Article, Product, FAQPage, Organization).

    Fix. Add an application/ld+json script block describing the page. Validate with Google's Rich Results Test before deploying.

  • Broken links
    0/5 broken in sample
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Broken internal links waste crawl budget, degrade UX, and signal to Google that the site isn't well-maintained. They also cap how deep crawlers reach.

    Passing looks like. Every internal link in the sample returns 2xx or 3xx. No dead anchors, no stale paths.

    Fix. Use the link list above to spot the broken paths. Either restore the missing pages or update the links to point at live URLs.

  • Image alt text
    All have alt
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Alt text is what screen readers read aloud, and what Google reads instead of pixels. Skip it and you lose on both fronts.

    Passing looks like. Every meaningful image has a descriptive alt attribute. Decorative images can use alt="" to be skipped intentionally.

    Fix. Audit images in /assets and CMS uploads. Write alts that describe what's in the image, not what it links to.

Heading outline

Every H1, H2, and H3 we found on the page, in document order.

Show heading outline
  1. H1AFPM Motor Supply for Compact High-Torque Programs
  2. H2What You Can Qualify Before RFQ
  3. H2Timeline and Control Points Buyers Ask About
  4. H2Start with the AFPM supply form your project actually needs.
  5. H2Custom work is useful only when the variables are explicit.
  6. H2Evidence buyers should ask for before shipment.
  7. H2A practical route from first email to recurring supply.
  8. H2Match the motor conversation to the real operating duty.
  9. H2Latest Engineering Guides
  10. H2Send the parameters that change design, cost, and lead time.
  11. H2Technical & Sourcing Clarifications
  12. H2Send the AFPM Parameters That Matter
  13. H3Motor / Generator Builds
  14. H3Package & Interface Control
  15. H3Thermal & Duty Review
  16. H3Traceable Test Plan
  17. H3Product Capability First
  18. H3Custom Scope With Inputs
  19. H3Quality Gates, Not Slogans
  20. H3Prototype to Volume Path
  21. H3Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Motors
  22. H3AFPM Stator and Rotor Assemblies
  23. H3Dual-Rotor AFPM Motors
  24. H3AFPM Generators
  25. H3Before sample build
  26. H3Prototype release
  27. H3Pilot lot
  28. H3Volume supply
  29. H3RFQ intake
  30. H3Feasibility and quotation scope
  31. H3Prototype sample
  32. H3Pilot to production
  33. H3Electric Motorcycle and Light EV Drives
  34. H3Robotics Compact Joint Drives
  35. H3Drone and eVTOL Propulsion
  36. H3Renewable Direct-Drive Generators
  37. H3Foxconn & Magnax €35.5M Investment: Industrializing Yokeless Axial Flux Motors
  38. H3Scaling Axial Flux Motors in 2026: How the EU MAXIMA Project Addresses Manufacturing and CRM Constraints
  39. H3Specifying Axial Flux Motors for 800V Architectures: Insulation & PD Risks
  40. H3What parameters do you need for a preliminary sizing check?
  41. H3Do you provide dyno test reports with prototype batches?
  42. H3Can we procure only the stator/rotor active parts?
  43. H3Is coreless AFPM better than iron-core AFPM?
  44. H3What affects lead time for a customized prototype?
Sampled links

We HEAD-check up to five internal links to spot broken paths quickly.

Show sampled links

Was this report useful?

Share this scan

Every CrawlRanker scan gets a public, shareable URL. Send it to a client, post it in a thread, or benchmark a competitor.

Scan another site

Preview scan. SEO checks are live. AI scoring is in beta.