Back
Scan complete

crawlranker.com

1 page · 2.9s · Scanned just now

0/ 100
AI automation score

Mostly human-written

78% confidence

How to read this score
0–35 · Mostly human35–65 · Mixed signals65–100 · Mostly AI

The score is a fingerprint of automation, not a quality judgment. A high score means the page reads as machine-generated. It doesn't mean the page is bad.

What we scanned
Page title
CrawlRanker — Free SEO audit + AI-content score for any URL
Meta description
Free site-wide SEO audit in 30 seconds. CrawlRanker grades your meta tags, headings, schema, mobile readiness, and broken links — plus an AI-content score with confidence on every finding.
Final URL
https://crawlranker.com/en(after redirect from https://crawlranker.com/)
Language
en
Built with
Next.js
Social preview
What we saw

This page is clearly human-authored. The prose contains specific product mechanics ("meta tags, headings, schema, mobile readiness"), named tools ("Claude"), and explicit trade-offs ("public reports are how the methodology gets challenged"). The structure rejects boilerplate—numbered features, FAQ format, no testimonials or pricing grid. The tone is cautious and self-aware ("Accurate enough to be useful, honest enough to tell you when it is not"), with no marketing-speak uniformity. The 544-word body is substantial and consistent.

Top findings
  • Worth notingContent

    Strong specificity and transparency in product mechanics; no hedge-and-explain phrasing

    Evidence
    • The scan fetches the page once, parses it server-side, runs the SEO rubric, and asks Claude to read the same content for the AI-automation score.body
    • Every score includes a confidence percentage. Pages with mixed signals deliberately produce lower confidence and a 'Mixed signals' verdict rather than a forced call.body
    Try this

    Continue this level of technical honesty—it differentiates the site from marketing copy and builds trust.

  • Worth notingTone

    Cautious, transparent voice that acknowledges limitations and trade-offs upfront

    Evidence
    • No signup. Each scan becomes a public report — don't submit URLs you'd rather keep private.body
    • Accurate enough to be useful, honest enough to tell you when it is not.body
    Try this

    Maintain this transparent voice throughout marketing and product copy—it's a genuine differentiator.

What's working

Signals of human authorship the page is doing well.

  • Content

    Named tool (Claude), specific technical details (meta tags, schema, mobile readiness), and explicit trade-offs rather than hidden terms

  • Tone

    Self-aware, cautious voice that volunteers limitations ('Accurate enough to be useful, honest enough to tell you when it is not')

SEO auditExcellent
93/100
AI breakdown by category
  • Content22

    Specific product mechanics and honest trade-offs explained plainly; no generic LLM phrasing like "leverage" or "unlock"

  • Structure15

    Irregular layout—numbered features (01, 02, 03), FAQ section, no boilerplate hero→grid→testimonials template

  • Imagery8

    No images on page; pure text-based design with no stock photos or AI-generated visuals

  • Tone28

    Cautious, transparent voice with direct trade-off language ("don't submit URLs you'd rather keep private") and explicit methodology details

By the numbers
  • Words544
  • Images0
  • Alt coverage100%
  • Internal links10
  • External links0
  • Schema blocks3
  • HTML size80 KB
SEO audit detail
  • Meta tags
    All present
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Title and description are the two strings Google shows in search results. They decide whether anyone clicks. A canonical tag tells Google which URL is the source of truth when the same content lives at multiple paths.

    Passing looks like. A non-empty title under 60 characters, a meta description under 160, and a self-referencing canonical link.

    Fix. Add the missing tags inside the page head. Treat the title as a headline you'd want to read in a SERP, not a brand slogan.

  • Heading structure
    1 H1, 4 H2
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Headings are how crawlers and assistive tech understand a page's outline. One H1 names the page. H2s break it into sections. Skipped levels and missing H1s confuse both.

    Passing looks like. Exactly one H1, at least one H2, and no skipped levels (no H1 to H3 jumps).

    Fix. Replace the missing or duplicate H1 with a single, descriptive heading. Promote section titles to H2. Demote sub-points to H3.

  • Mobile readiness
    Responsive
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Google indexes mobile-first. A page without a responsive viewport renders zoomed-out on phones, fails Core Web Vitals on touch, and loses its mobile ranking.

    Passing looks like. A meta viewport tag with width=device-width and a layout that reflows under 600px.

    Fix. Add a viewport meta tag set to width=device-width and initial-scale=1, then audit your largest blocks at mobile widths.

  • Page speed signals
    2.9s response
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Page weight and response time directly feed Core Web Vitals. Slow LCP and oversized HTML hurt rankings more than people expect.

    Passing looks like. First-byte under 1.5s, HTML payload under 500 KB, fewer than 30 images on the initial render.

    Fix. Trim render-blocking scripts, defer non-critical CSS, and serve compressed images sized to the viewport. Move heavy components below the fold.

  • Schema markup
    3 schema blocks
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. JSON-LD structured data is how you earn rich results: review stars, FAQ accordions, breadcrumbs, article cards. Skip it and Google has nothing structured to pull from when it builds your SERP card.

    Passing looks like. At least one valid JSON-LD block matching schema.org types relevant to the page (Article, Product, FAQPage, Organization).

    Fix. Add an application/ld+json script block describing the page. Validate with Google's Rich Results Test before deploying.

  • Broken links
    0/5 broken in sample
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Broken internal links waste crawl budget, degrade UX, and signal to Google that the site isn't well-maintained. They also cap how deep crawlers reach.

    Passing looks like. Every internal link in the sample returns 2xx or 3xx. No dead anchors, no stale paths.

    Fix. Use the link list above to spot the broken paths. Either restore the missing pages or update the links to point at live URLs.

  • Image alt text
    No images
    Why this matters

    Why it matters. Alt text is what screen readers read aloud, and what Google reads instead of pixels. Skip it and you lose on both fronts.

    Passing looks like. Every meaningful image has a descriptive alt attribute. Decorative images can use alt="" to be skipped intentionally.

    Fix. Audit images in /assets and CMS uploads. Write alts that describe what's in the image, not what it links to.

Heading outline

Every H1, H2, and H3 we found on the page, in document order.

Show heading outline
  1. H1Free SEO audit for any URL. Plus an AI-content score.
  2. H2Full SEO audit
  3. H2AI automation score
  4. H2Shareable results
  5. H2Things people ask
  6. H3Product
  7. H3Company
  8. H3Legal
Sampled links

We HEAD-check up to five internal links to spot broken paths quickly.

Show sampled links

Was this report useful?

Share this scan

Every CrawlRanker scan gets a public, shareable URL. Send it to a client, post it in a thread, or benchmark a competitor.

Preview scan. SEO checks are live. AI scoring is in beta.