Scan complete

ferritecustom.com

1 page · 0.5s · Scanned just now

0/ 100

AI automation score

Mostly AI-generated

68% confidence

How to read this score

0–35 · Mostly human35–65 · Mixed signals65–100 · Mostly AI

The score is a fingerprint of automation, not a quality judgment. A high score means the page reads as machine-generated. It doesn't mean the page is bad.

What we saw

The page shows a blend of domain-specific procurement language and marketing-template structure. Headings like "RFQ Requirement Intake" and "Lot Traceability" reflect real manufacturing workflow; however, the 9-item listicle with identical H3 heading structure and the hedge-and-explain pattern ("are aligned to," "are organized for") are consistent with partial AI drafting or templating. The imagery is too sparse (4 images, 3 unalt'd) to resolve the signal, keeping confidence moderate.

70/100Managed

AI Governance

3 governance risks detected

3 medium

What we scanned

Page title: FerriteCustom | Custom Ferrite Magnet Manufacturer
Meta description: FerriteCustom is a China-based ferrite magnet factory supporting OEM customization, stable mass production, and global RFQ delivery.
Final URL: https://ferritecustom.com/
Canonical URL: https://ferritecustom.com/
Robots directive: Not set — search engines default to index, follow
Language: en
Built with: Next.js

Search & social preview

How the page presents itself in a Google result and as a shared link, rebuilt from the tags we crawled.

Google result

ferritecustom.comferritecustom.com

FerriteCustom | Custom Ferrite Magnet Manufacturer

FerriteCustom is a China-based ferrite magnet factory supporting OEM customization, stable mass production, and global RFQ delivery.

Title · 50 characters
Description · 132 characters

Fine-tune this snippet in the SERP simulator

Shared link card

ferritecustom.com

FerriteCustom | Custom Ferrite Magnet Manufacturer

FerriteCustom is a China-based ferrite magnet factory supporting OEM customization, stable mass production, and global RFQ delivery.

Open Graph image present

AI Governance

70/100

Managed3 risks detected

mediumAI score ≥ 70 (predominantly AI-generated content)

AI-generated content may not be copyrightable

The US Copyright Office has held that AI-generated content without sufficient human authorship cannot be registered and receives no copyright protection. This means competitors can freely copy AI-generated pages and you lose exclusivity over your content.

US Copyright Office — Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (2023)EU Copyright Directive

Official guidanceUS Copyright Office — AI and Copyright guidance Copyright Office — Policy Statement on AI-generated works

Fix

AI authorship documentation guide

## Protecting AI-Assisted Content

To maximise copyright protection for AI-assisted content:

1. **Document human contributions** — Keep records of the prompts used,
   the editorial decisions made, and the human modifications applied.

2. **Edit substantially** — Meaningful human selection, arrangement, and
   creative editing of AI output can establish copyrightable authorship.

3. **Register what you can** — Register works with significant human
   authorship via the US Copyright Office, disclosing AI use as required.

4. **Update your Terms of Service** to address AI-generated content:
   > "Content on this site may be created with AI assistance. We retain
   > rights to the selection, arrangement, and editorial expression of
   > all published content."

See the Copyright Office's [AI guidance](https://www.copyright.gov/ai/)
for current registration requirements.

Pro2 more risks hidden

Unlock the full breakdown

Pro shows each risk’s plain-English explanation, regulatory framework, official guidance links, and copy-paste fix snippets — plus the AI-generated governance document for your site.

2 medium

See Pro pricing

Top findings

Clear signalStructure
9-item operational-controls listicle uses identical H3 heading structure, typical of templated page builders
Evidence
- “RFQ Requirement Intake”H3
- “Grade and Magnetization Review”H3
- “Tolerance Stack Governance”H3
Try this
Vary the H3 heading format — use 2-4 word labels for section titles and rewrite body text as full sentences specific to each control point, rather than the current template-like parallel structure
Clear signalContent
Hedge-and-explain pattern repeats throughout: claim, then 'are aligned to' or 'are organized for' restatement
Evidence
- “Material grade and magnetization direction are aligned to application duty cycle”body
- “Batch traceability and inspection records are organized for lot-level issue analysis”body
- “Inspection method, sampling plan, and acceptance window are synchronized between supplier and buyer quality teams”body
Try this
Rewrite using active voice with direct action — 'We align material grade to your application duty cycle' or 'We organize batch traceability for root-cause analysis' — to tighten prose and reduce redundancy
Worth notingImagery
3 of 4 images lack alt text; image treatment insufficient to assess authenticity
Evidence
- “missing alt: 3”page
Try this
Add descriptive alt text to all images — e.g., 'Ferrite ring magnet in production,' 'FerriteCustom factory floor,' — to aid accessibility and provide context for visitors

What's working

Signals of human authorship the page is doing well.

Content
Domain-specific terminology ('RFQ-first quotation,' 'tolerance stack governance,' 'lot traceability') reflects genuine manufacturing expertise and avoids generic startup phrasing

SEO auditFair

71/100

AI breakdown by category

Content68
Procurement-focused terminology ("RFQ-first," "process controls," "tolerance stack governance") shows subject expertise, but repetitive listicle structure with 9 identical H3s (each 2-4 words) and hedge-explain patterns ("captured by," "ali
Structure78
Hero → capabilities snapshot → 9-item operational-signals listicle → FAQ → CTA follows boilerplate order; however, the 9-item operational-controls section breaks the typical 3-icon grid template, suggesting some customization
Imagery60
Only 4 images total, 3 missing alt text; no visible AI-generation hallmarks (filenames, gradients) but insufficient visual treatment to assess stock-photo uniformity or custom intent
Tone70
Consistent procurement-team-facing register throughout (no jokes, no regional flavor, no first-person personality), but terminology specificity and lack of generic corporate phrasing ("leverage," "seamless") shows some domain authorship

By the numbers

Words420
Images4
Alt coverage25%
Internal links35
External links1
Schema blocks1
HTML size152 KB
Text-to-HTML2%

LLM-marker phrases

No common LLM-marker phrases found — none of the stock AI vocabulary we scan for appears in the body text even once.

SEO audit detail

Meta tags
All present
Why this matters
Why it matters. Title and description are the two strings Google shows in search results. They decide whether anyone clicks. A canonical tag tells Google which URL is the source of truth when the same content lives at multiple paths.
Passing looks like. A non-empty title under 60 characters, a meta description under 160, and a self-referencing canonical link.
Fix. Add the missing tags inside the page head. Treat the title as a headline you'd want to read in a SERP, not a brand slogan.
Heading structure
1 H1, 4 H2
Why this matters
Why it matters. Headings are how crawlers and assistive tech understand a page's outline. One H1 names the page. H2s break it into sections. Skipped levels and missing H1s confuse both.
Passing looks like. Exactly one H1, at least one H2, and no skipped levels (no H1 to H3 jumps).
Fix. Replace the missing or duplicate H1 with a single, descriptive heading. Promote section titles to H2. Demote sub-points to H3.
Mobile readiness
Responsive
Why this matters
Why it matters. Google indexes mobile-first. A page without a responsive viewport renders zoomed-out on phones, fails Core Web Vitals on touch, and loses its mobile ranking.
Passing looks like. A meta viewport tag with width=device-width and a layout that reflows under 600px.
Fix. Add a viewport meta tag set to width=device-width and initial-scale=1, then audit your largest blocks at mobile widths.
Page speed signals
0.5s · 152 KB
Why this matters
Why it matters. Page weight and response time directly feed Core Web Vitals. Slow LCP and oversized HTML hurt rankings more than people expect.
Passing looks like. First-byte under 1.5s, HTML payload under 500 KB, fewer than 30 images on the initial render.
Fix. Trim render-blocking scripts, defer non-critical CSS, and serve compressed images sized to the viewport. Move heavy components below the fold.
Schema markup
1 schema blocks
Why this matters
Why it matters. JSON-LD structured data is how you earn rich results: review stars, FAQ accordions, breadcrumbs, article cards. Skip it and Google has nothing structured to pull from when it builds your SERP card.
Passing looks like. At least one valid JSON-LD block matching schema.org types relevant to the page (Article, Product, FAQPage, Organization).
Fix. Add an application/ld+json script block describing the page. Validate with Google's Rich Results Test before deploying.
Broken links
2/5 broken in sample
Why this matters
Why it matters. Broken internal links waste crawl budget, degrade UX, and signal to Google that the site isn't well-maintained. They also cap how deep crawlers reach.
Passing looks like. Every internal link in the sample returns 2xx or 3xx. No dead anchors, no stale paths.
Fix. Use the link list above to spot the broken paths. Either restore the missing pages or update the links to point at live URLs.
Image alt text
3/4 missing alt
Why this matters
Why it matters. Alt text is what screen readers read aloud, and what Google reads instead of pixels. Skip it and you lose on both fronts.
Passing looks like. Every meaningful image has a descriptive alt attribute. Decorative images can use alt="" to be skipped intentionally.
Fix. Audit images in /assets and CMS uploads. Write alts that describe what's in the image, not what it links to.

Heading outline

Every H1, H2, and H3 we found on the page, in document order.

Show heading outline

H1Custom Ferrite Magnets for Global OEM Buyers
H2Production and Delivery at Scale
H2Process controls procurement teams typically verify
H2Frequently Asked Questions from Procurement Teams
H2Start Your Ferrite Magnet Inquiry
H3RFQ Requirement Intake
H3Grade and Magnetization Review
H3Tolerance Stack Governance
H3Pilot Validation Gate
H3Lot Traceability
H3Incoming Inspection Alignment
H3Tooling and Process Readiness
H3Packaging and Label Controls
H3Export Documentation Discipline
H3Issue Escalation Workflow
H3Capacity and Continuity Planning
H3Review Cadence
H3Do you support OEM dimensions and custom magnetization?
H3Which ferrite grades do you supply?
H3What is your typical lead time for mass production?
H3Can you support export and compliance documents?
H3Can't find what you're looking for?

Sampled links

We HEAD-check up to five internal links to spot broken paths quickly.

Show sampled links

200 · OKhttps://ferritecustom.com/industries/speakers-audio
404 · Brokenhttps://ferritecustom.com/products/ferrite-custom-machined
404 · Brokenhttps://ferritecustom.com/products/ferrite-multipole-rings
200 · OKhttps://ferritecustom.com/products/ferrite-blocks
200 · OKhttps://ferritecustom.com/products/ferrite-arcs-segments

Was this report useful?

Share this scan

Every CrawlRanker scan gets a public, shareable URL. Send it to a client, post it in a thread, or benchmark a competitor.

Scan another site

Preview scan. SEO checks are live. AI scoring is in beta.